Is Christian Satire Ungodly?

When Mark Driscoll was revealed for his book shenanigans I started coming up with a string of quips under the hashtag DricollSchoolOf Ethics:

Remember, it’s not plagiarism – it’s flattery, because imitation is…well, you know.

Remember, when accused of plagiarism the best defense is, “Well, great minds think alike.”

Remember, when accused of plagiarism always come back with, “But I didn’t write it. Blame my ghostwriter.”

Before long, an atheist/former pastor who followed me jumped in and commented that I was acting inappropriately.

“u do realize that u are publicly attacking a fellow brother in Christ? Is that what Jesus would want u to do?”

This issue has reared its head again recently, when a blogger went after the satirical Christian news site The Babylon Bee. Jonathan Hollingsworth notes that the satire site is popular due to its “ability to pass bigotry off as satire.”

I don’t think I’ll be able to sway anyone to agree with me, but I did want to take a couple seconds to address the issue and tell you why I think Christian satire and pointed mocking is appropriate.

1. The Bible DOES talk about handling grievances privately between individuals. The biblical guidance for such behavior is between people who have a damaged relationship. The goal of going to the “brother” is so that relationship can be repaired and restored (see Matthew 18 as an example). HOWEVER…

2. The Bible DOES give us multiple examples of Jesus (and others) calling out poor behavior in a public setting.

– Upset with money-changers taking advantage of worshippers, Jesus tears through the temple flipping over tables and whipping men with a cord.
– Upset with the super-religious, John the Baptist calls the Pharisees and Sadducees “you brood of vipers.”
– Upset with the super-religious, Jesus calls them “you brood of vipers.”
– Jesus repeatedly publicly calls out religious leaders as “hypocrites.”
– Paul has to call out Peter for his poor behavior regarding unfair treatment of Gentiles in the church.

While not every instance of publicly calling someone out in the Bible is a mirror image of today’s situations, there is still a strong case to be made for publicly addressing and calling out those who want to claim righteousness yet blatantly disregard God’s call to holiness. Jesus himself used sarcasm and satire to drive his point home.

Publicly tearing people down for no reason other than to hurt is never right. Using sarcasm or satire to drive home a point about the behavior of those who claim to be God-followers is well-supported in the Bible.

How about you? What do you think? Where should we draw the line when it comes to public rebuke?

Photo via Wikipedia

The Xian Satirist
Latest posts by The Xian Satirist (see all)
Comments 2
  1. While there is much wrong about TBN and the prosperity theology the Crouches promoted and allowed on their network, the satire peace on the day of Jan Crouch’s death was completely inappropriate and uncalled for when a family is grieving. A more reasoned theological rebuke would be better, and even that can wait until after the funeral.

    Some of the same Twitter handles that slam the prosperity teachers talked about Muhammed Ali “now floating like a butterfly” and being free from the pain of a broken body. So we slam a Christian with bad theology, but give a Muslim boxer a pass.

  2. I love satire. I love sarcasm. I love your anon account. I love to use satire and sarcasm on my anon account. I used to love the Babylon Bee. However, I prefer to use King Lune’s guidelines from “A Horse In His Boy”:
    “Shame, Corrin. Never taunt a man save when he is stronger than you–then, as you please.”
    I’ll taunt stronger men all day long, and receive their taunts in turn. The specific criticism against the Babylon Bee is that they’ve recently turned their taunts to those weaker than them. This specific blogger used Transgender people as an example, but they’ve been doing it for a couple of months. They lost my respect when they did that, and I have no desire to read them any more. .

Comments are closed.

Episode 020.6: Ideological Feminism – Kathleen Hanna VS LEAH (McHenry)

Episode 020.6: Ideological Feminism – Kathleen Hanna VS LEAH (McHenry)

When Mark Driscoll was revealed for his book shenanigans I started coming up

Let’s Talk Dementia [Podcast], Episode 12 – Why is Music Important for Individuals with Dementia?

Let’s Talk Dementia [Podcast], Episode 12 – Why is Music Important for Individuals with Dementia?

When Mark Driscoll was revealed for his book shenanigans I started coming up